A recently published report, "Climate Change Policy and Industrial Competitiveness: Ten Insights From Europe on the EU Emissions Trading Scheme," provides insight into the ETS and "suggests key lessons relevant to current U.S. [climate change related] debates" as well as some recommendations.
The report was written by a team headed by Michael Grubb, the chief economist for the U.K.-based Carbon Trust and a highly regarded expert on emissions trading. The report was commissioned by the German Marshall Fund of the United States.
Among some of the report's observations:
- Emissions trading works: European emissions have been reduced by 120-300 million metric tons of carbon dioxide during the first phase of the ETS, according to an MIT study.
- The impact on gross domestic product is small: "Don't let concerns about macroeconomic impacts dictate the environmental targets," the report says. "Economic impacts have been consistently less than projected."
- Competitiveness impacts are limited to a relatively small group of industries: Tailored solutions to those industries that are involved in international business should be considered.
- Windfall profits may result if too many free allocations are handed out (oh what a difficult lesson the Europeans learned on this one...my comment, not the authors').
- Auctioning of allocations should be maximized.
No comments:
Post a Comment